Editorial Policy

Zerionia is independently published. Editorial decisions — what to cover, how to frame it, what to conclude — are made solely by the editorial team. No advertiser, partner, or sponsor influences editorial content.

When we feature a product or tool we have built ourselves, we say so explicitly. Conflicts of interest are disclosed at the top of the article.

We verify claims before publishing. For technical articles, all code and processes are tested in real environments. For analysis pieces, primary sources are cited where available.

Opinions are clearly labelled as such. Speculative or forward-looking statements are qualified accordingly.

Each article goes through a minimum of one editorial review pass. Claims relying on third-party data are checked against the original source. Links to primary sources are included whenever they are publicly accessible.

If a claim cannot be adequately verified, it is either removed or clearly presented as unconfirmed.

We correct errors promptly and transparently. When a factual error is identified — whether reported by a reader or found internally — we update the article, note the correction at the bottom of the piece, and, for significant errors, issue a separate correction notice.

We do not silently alter published content. The date of the last material update is displayed on each article.

We attribute ideas, data, and quotes to their original sources. When we build on the work of others, we link to it. We do not reproduce substantial portions of copyrighted material without permission.

If you believe something we have published is inaccurate, misleading, or in breach of this policy, please contact us at contact@zerionia.com with the article URL and a description of the issue. We commit to reviewing all substantive reports within 5 business days.